via lifehacker.com
via lifehacker.com
As we approach 2013, it is time again for the LinkedIn team to refresh our popular buzzwords analysis from previous years. Do members still describe themselves as “creative” and “effective” professionals with “extensive experience” or did the most overused words in LinkedIn Profiles change from last year’s analysis?
When we ran the analysis in 2011, we had 135 million members around the globe. Now we have more than 187 million. Even though we added more than 50 million new members since we did the last ranking, the data tells us that the number one buzzword globally is “creative” once again.
Taking a look at more than 187 million profiles members have worldwide [1], these are the top buzzwords for a selection of countries:
Analytical: Switzerland
Creative: Australia, Canada, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, Sweden, U.S.
Effective: India
Experimental: Brazil
Motivated: Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom
Multinational: Egypt, Indonesia
Responsible: France, Italy
Specialized: Spain
Here are the top 10 buzzwords used in the United States in 2012:
As was the case last year, “creative”, “organizational”, “effective” are in the top three. This year though, more members this year described themselves as “responsible” and “analytical”, which made an appearance on our ranking for the first time. As a result, “dynamic” and “communication skills” got knocked off the list. “Motivated” is now ranked higher than “extensive experience” which was the top buzzword in 2010.
Your LinkedIn Profile is an opportunity to define your professional identity. Set yourself apart in the new year by wiping your profile clean of buzzwords!
Update your LinkedIn profile today
[1] Methodological details: We followed the same methodology as last year, we included non-English profiles in the analysis after translating them. We aggregated the adjectives in the summary section of our member’s public profiles and removed some overused nouns (e.g., “mobile”) and other irrelevant words. From that list we sorted words by frequency and took the top 10 for each country.
Journalist Christopher Moloney walks to work through Central Park on most days, and last summer he made an observation. “Every day I walked past tons of locations from popular—and not-so-popular—movies,” he explains. He decided to start printing out stills from the films and comparing them to their real-life counterparts. “Since then, I’ve re-created more than 250 scenes around the city.” His work—which includes movies as varied as Midnight Run, The French Connection, and Shaft—can be found at his Web site, FILMography. “I’m actually surprised that locations used in the 1940s and 1950s haven’t changed that much,” he says. “But places used in movies last year are virtually unrecognizable.” New York also changes depending on the director, Moloney adds. “You can tell just how much filmmakers like Woody Allen and Martin Scorsese and Spike Lee love the city. It’s sometimes hard to believe that those three very different places are all the same city.”
via vanityfair.com
Wednesday, November 21, 2012: Gone are the days when Microsoft used to be an enemy of open source technology. Times have changed and so has Microsoft, to the extent that the company has started its own open source subsidiary. And now, Microsoft has become one of the major contributors to Linux, and is working to build an ecosystem where proprietary and open source technologies go hand-in-hand. Mandar Naik, Director—Platform Strategy at Microsoft and the man behind such efforts in India, reveals how the company has changed over the years.
Mandar, what is your role at Microsoft?
My role is probably different from most folks at Microsoft, who sell Microsoft products and compete with open source product vendors. I do compete with open source 'products' as well, but my primary focus is to drive strong partnerships with open source because one of the core things that has happened over the past six to seven years at Microsoft is a vast change in how we look at things. If you go back 10 years, you could have said that Microsoft competed with open source. It was all driven by what customers wanted. Ten years ago, there was this huge debate on what was good—open source or proprietary software. Today, if you look at the mature markets, the conversation has really changed tremendously.
In what way?
One of the fundamental things that customers have realised is that it’s not about whether the source is open or closed. At the end of the day, it is about getting a job done. So, for CIO's, the objective is to get the business solution going. If there is an open source solution to it, that’s great; and if there is a proprietary solution, that’s fine too. Most IT environments nowadays are mixed source. You can no longer say that a company uses only open source solutions or proprietary solutions. Customers want compatibility of both the open as well as proprietary, irrespective of their operating systems. So customers have driven that change, based on how their needs have changed. That is the reason why Microsoft has changed. And it’s not just Microsoft that has changed. You can see a lot of change happening across the board even in the open source community. In recent times, we have seen tremendous opportunities where we can partner with open source and vice versa. There are a huge number of developers who use technologies varying from Dot Net and Java to PHP. So, what Microsoft has done is focus on the fact that we don't want to tell PHP developers to give away their expertise in PHP and start developing on Dot Net. We want them to continue with PHP and leverage their expertise in PHP. What we ensure now is to work with the PHP community so that PHP runs as well on our platform (Windows) as it does on any other. So that's the kind of partnership that we are looking at driving.
Microsoft is putting in humongous efforts within the company towards driving strategic partnerships. Today, we are committed to ensuring that every product we come up with inter-operates well with all other products. That's the biggest change that has happened. If you look back two years, we had started seeing these changes coming into our main product. So, if you are a Java developer or a PHP developer, and want to develop on Windows, don't worry about it; we will provide you the tools required for developing on Windows and these tools are open source. That was the good starting point in India. That's where the partnership with the open source community began. We are learning to work with the open source community and the open source community is learning to work with us. If you look at mature markets like the US, there has been tremendous progress. We are in a mixed source environment today.
So, will it be correct to say that Microsoft's attitude has changed over six to seven years because customers have demanded it?
Look at it in this way—we’ve got to be very realistic on why we exist as an industry. It’s not about Microsoft or open souce companies. Individual developers exist for the purpose of serving the customers’ need. So, for us, it is very natural to always do what customers need. That is reflected in every product that we have come up with and, obviously, there is a whole lot of innovation there. There are times when we have shown customers the right path, when we have seen them struggling in a certain area and have come up with solutions to help them. There have also been times when customers have come to us and said, “These are the changing business needs that I have, so now you go out and figure how you are going to help.” So, I think that this change in Microsoft has occurred a long time ago. Six to seven years ago is when it has started to show, but the change actually began a long time ago and it was really driven by our customers.
Steve Balmer called Linux a cancer back in 2000, and the Linux Foundation recently released a report, which shows that Microsoft is among the top 20 contributors to the kernel. Do you feel that Microsoft is still struggling with the image makeover?
What Steve Balmer said over 10 years ago is not denied, but it also reflected the reality of the software market at that time. It is just like, 10 years ago we couldn't have imagined that enterprises would be willing to give the up control of their on-premise software and put it on the cloud, because the options did not exist back then. It is also natural for the open source community and developers to ask this question. Today, I personally think there are no proprietary software developers or open source developers. A developer is a developer. Look, if we were really not keen and committed to work with the open source community or industry, there would have been no point for all these investments. We always knew that this journey to becoming more open as a company was not going to be a short one and hence we were always in it for the long haul. It has not been merely an image makeover, but a strategic shift in how we see ourselves working with others. If you look at the mature markets like North America or Europe, our partnership with the open source universe has really made a huge impact on enterprises and customers. As an example, let’s look at our partnership with SUSE that we entered into a few years ago— there are customers who have deployed SUSE and Microsoft in a virtualised environment and this has happened because of the partnership. SUSE, too, was very keen on our partnership. So, honestly, it’s not just lip service. It’s not something fake to keep people quiet.
The IT industry is consistently and continuously changing, and we have to adapt to those changes. Our commitment of partnering with the open source community is a part of the journey. But that doesn't mean that we are not going to compete. We see competitors today even in the open source ecosystem, just like we see competitors in the proprietary ecosystem. This competition is separate from the overall development of the industry. So, when we speak about partnering with the open source ecosystem, we mean to work a way forward. When it comes to competing, we will keep on doing so with our open source competitors. So, if you talk about the cloud, for example, we compete with Amazon. It’s a proprietary platform. Similarly, we would compete with other open source cloud platforms. We see this competing as distinct from partnering with the open source ecosystem. The open source ecosystem is separate from the open source vendors. Red Hat is our competitor, and we compete with it.
I think what people in India need to see is that Microsoft is not competing with the open source ecosystem or the ideology. I think this has been proven enough by the fact that more than 80 per cent of all open source projects that exist in the world run well on Windows as well. If we were not serious about really partnering with the open source ecosystem, we would have never built something that makes open source work on our system. For developers who really question if Microsoft is serious about this, my answer would be 'absolutely'. So, I would urge those developers to go to www.microsoft.com/openness to get a feel of what we are actually up to. There are open source enthusiasts who are as actively participating in projects as Microsoft is. That's what people in India need to see and that's my job. Given that India has the second largest developer base in the world, there need to be a whole lot of positive messages going out from our side. And we really want people to converse with us as much as possible.Microsoft is investing in open source technologies like NODE.JS to make them mainstream on our platform. With the new IaaS offerings on Windows Azure, we now support various flavours of Linux on our popular cloud platform. So, it’s up to Microsoft and the leaders of the open source community to start seeing this as an opportunity. If you develop an app that is not compatible with Windows, then you are simply cutting yourself out from almost 90 per cent of an opportunity. We don't want developers to do that. If people choose to be Java or PHP developers, we are not stopping them. We are, in fact, here to provide an extended opportunity to such developers to take their solutions to market. That's why it is important that the open source community and Microsoft work closely. Competition will remain, just like Red Hat competes with Canonical and SUSE. We are just a vendor when it comes to competing. So the ‘compete space’ is very different. What unfortunately tends to happen is that people bring that compete situation into the ideological conversations. For Microsoft, a developer is a developer. For the developer, there are just two things that are important —to really drive the technology forward with passion and enthusiasm, and two, to be financially successful, and known for their good work. I don't see a reason why developers should be bound to a platform—be it open source or proprietary. They should have access to everything.
As interest in interoperability and open source evolved to the cloud and devices, we brought in Microsoft Open Technologies Inc as a wholly owned subsidiary. We believe it is the best way to serve developers, customers and partners better. Microsoft is committed to openness. Microsoft is becoming more open in the way that we work with and collaborate with others in the industry, in how we listen to customers, and in our approach to the cloud. While this subsidiary has been formed in the US, the existing openness initiatives and those going forward through this subsidiary will definitely benefit customers, developers and the open source ecosystem globally, including those in India.
So, if I were to read between the lines, is Microsoft giving open source developers a chance to commercialise their work?
It’s not just about commercialisation. It is about innovation and ensuring that they are successful, both commercially and in terms of popularity. Why would a developer or a company invest a huge amount of time and resources on something that would not give them a great growth opportunity. That's what the fundamentals of any business are. Our view on the whole thing is that the developers should choose. If they think proprietary technology can give them growth, it’s their choice. If they think open source can do it for them, it’s great. What is even better is when they use opportunities involving both technologies.Let’s be honest, there is nothing called 'free' in the world today. If users get something free and are stuck with it, and then have to pay somebody to help them use or maintain it, it is not ‘free’ ultimately. So at the end of the day, there is nothing that is totally free. Ultimately, it’s about the customers and developers. And beyond all that, it is about innovation.
You just mentioned the interoperability factor. Windows 8 is being heavily criticised for not being friendly with open source because of the secure-boot feature. It is being said that users will not be able to boot Linux operating systems on Windows 8 PCs. How do you defend that?
Secure boot attempts to protect the PC against boot loader attacks, which can compromise a system before the OS even loads. Secure boot is actually a feature of Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI), a new type of boot environment that has gradually been replacing the standard BIOS process. Windows 8 taps into UEFI's secure boot to ensure that the pre-OS environment is safe and secure. The secure-boot feature is an innovation that has come through to ensure that there is security. I think, today, security is a major concern, whether it is a Windows PC or a non-Windows PC. What we are leveraging in Windows 8 is just features and innovations that are coming up at the hardware level. I don't see a problem there because I know for a fact that there will be co-existence eventually, because this is a hardware innovation. It is just like how every product has to adapt to something or the other. There will always be features that may seem like blocking initially, but technology doesn't remain stationary and adaptation is required of everybody—whether it is Windows, Linux or different distributions of Linux. Infact we’ve already seen SUSE and other distributions adapt to the secure boot feature in UEFI.
Microsoft has joined hands with the state government in Tamil Nadu. As soon as Microsoft signed the agreement, the Tamil Nadu government changed its stance of using 'only' open source in the free laptops it gave students as soon as it inked a pact with the company. The students had to switch over to Windows, abandoning BOSS Linux, which generated ire from the community. The government finally settled for providing the dual-boot option rather than just BOSS or only Windows. Don't you think such efforts are a threat for the community?
See, I cannot comment on the political aspect of things. But I see it as a positive, because when the student graduates and is looking for employment, the student would have both options. Let's be honest—if they had gone for just Linux, it would have been a loss of opportunity for Microsoft, just like when we win something, it is a loss of opportunity for Linux. Every vendor, whether it is for Windows or for Linux, is going to capitalise on the growth and opportunities that India offers. So, at the end of the day, there will be times when X will win and times when Y will win. Regarding the particular case you mentioned, I think it is a perfect situation because as a student, I will get access to both. There is no cost issue involved here.
Going back to the fundamental issue, I would re-assert that there is nothing that is free (monetarily). Whether a government adopts a proprietary platform or an open source platform, there is a cost involved. That might be the upfront purchase cost or the cost of implementation, maintenance, etc. But there will be a cost. There are enough research studies today that mention companies saying that you cannot look at acquisition as the only cost. When you think about software and technology, you have to think about the longer term and the total cost of ownership, which includes not just the acquisition cost but things like implementation, deployment, maintenance, downtime, the security impact and all of that. So I think your point that proprietary software is more expensive and open source is less expensive, or free, is not true. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a commercial distribution of any open source software. Take any open source software company. They will have two versions of their software—one is the open source version and the other is the commercial version. Have you seen any company providing implementation, consulting and deployment support for free? Not really. Everybody has to make money.For Microsoft, we openly say that we are a proprietary software company in a majority of the things that we do and here is how much our software will cost. Open source software is slightly different. Those companies say that if people use their commercial software, they need to buy a subscription and that comes at a cost. I think what has happened in Tamil Nadu is great actually. Today, the student gets both Windows as well as Linux. What could be better for a student! Ultimately I think the Tamil Nadu government would have taken a decision based on what it thought was right and what was in the best interests of the students. I think it’s time that we moved ahead of the debate about which one is better—open source or proprietary technologies. I think the need of the hour is that both proprietary and open source technologies join hands. So, if students get laptops with both software, they get exposure and choice and we should let them have it. This will help in increasing their employability. The focus should be on building capabilities as opposed to discussions on technology.
What about Codeplex? It has over 28,000 projects. Are there projects that open source developers can make money from?
Absolutely! It would be very difficult for me to say who is making the money, or how much. I would like to use the example of Sugar CRM. The way they are making money is phenomenal. So I think it’s not about Source Forge or CodePlex, it’s about the developer having an idea, and willing to invest that amount of time and effort in turning that idea into a viable business proposition.
Diksha P Gupta, EFYTIMES News Network
« Farmers Market Update: Sydney, Australia 9 Tips To Eat Healthy When Holiday Traveling »
Nov 12 2012
How To Become A Great Cook Without Being A Chef
I have a confession to make: I don’t love to cook.
Sure I like the idea of cooking, and I’m glad that I can cook, but my idea of a perfect day rarely involves spending time in the kitchen.
What I really love is food.
I love to shop for ingredients and envision the delicious dishes I can make with them. I love the taste of fresh, ripe, seasonal produce from the farmers market. I love the way good food makes me feel. I love the knowledge that what I eat helps me thrive.
But cutting stuff up and putting it in a pan isn’t particularly fun for me, though I certainly enjoy the fruits of my labor.
For me cooking is a means to an end. I cook for my own health and happiness, and for whomever I happen to be sharing my time with at the moment.
This is enough for me.
I came to realize my lack of cooking passion over the past several weeks as I’ve watched my fellow food bloggers fret on Twitter over holiday meal plans, perfect cookies and fallen souffles. It became very obvious to me that I had no desire to entertain dozens of people or perfect the quintessential holiday recipe.
I’m proud of the food I make and it’s always important to me to do a good job (I love eating, remember), I just don’t have that extra drive that distinguishes a good cook from a true chef.
For some, cooking is a true passion–they adore being in the kitchen and everything it involves. These are my heroes. They are the brilliant chefs responsible for the exquisite food all over this wonderful city. They construct the fabulous recipes I count on when searching cookbooks and blogs for something new. They photograph the beautiful dishes that inspire me to try a little harder. Without passionate chefs we would not have spectacular food, and I am profoundly thankful for them.
But not all of us can be amazing cooks. Fortunately it isn’t necessary to be a Michelin-rated chef to make delicious food.
Simple, fresh cooking doesn’t require any special talent. It all starts with excellent ingredients and just a few basic techniques that anyone can master with practice.
The moral of the story is that you do not have to be a kitchen ninja (or even particularly enjoy cooking) to be able to feed yourself well on a daily basis. The most important step is getting in the habit of buying good-quality, seasonal food and learning the basic skills you need to whip up something you enjoy.
If you get in the habit of cooking for yourself, it will one day stop feeling like a big ordeal and become second nature. You’ll get faster at chopping, you won’t need to constantly check recipes and measure ingredients, and you’ll intuitively know when and in which order to add things to the pot. But all this takes practice, and if you don’t make a regular habit of cooking for yourself it will continue to be difficult.
The good news is once you are comfortable in the kitchen, more interesting and complex recipes start to sound appealing. This is not necessarily because you learned to love cooking, but simply because it is easier for you.
Once you’ve broken the proficiency barrier you open a world of different dishes and cuisines, unchaining yourself from repetitive stir fries and culinary boredom.
For the non-chef, this is the level of proficiency you want to achieve. You do not have to love cooking to enjoy making dinner. You just have to get beyond the point where you struggle with it. It really isn’t as hard as it sounds.
Why do you cook?
Originally published January 4, 2010.
Related Articles:
If you enjoyed this post, you might want to subscribe to Summer Tomato and follow me on Twitter!
Want more? Check out Summer Tomato Live!
Print This • ShareThis
43 Responses to “How To Become A Great Cook Without Being A Chef”
I love to cook for cooking’s sake. I consider it my creative outlet. I don’t paint. I can’t play any musical instrument. I try photography, but only 1 out of 50 pictures actually look good. But there is nothing better for me than to spend an entire Sunday cooking slow cooked food for that evening or for consumption later in the week. I came to cooking later in life. My wife says she cooked the first 25 years and now its my turn to cook. So bring on the fresh farmer’s market produce. Lets have that sustainably raised protein. Lets pour a glass of wine and enjoy the process of cooking as well as the end product.
That’s awesome. For me I notice cooking gets more and more stressful as the number of people I’m cooking for increases. I’m pretty happy to cook for just myself or one other person, but more than that and it starts getting painful. Maybe I’d feel differently with a bigger kitchen
I feel the same way, but I always chalked it up to not having much experience with cooking for many. Things like “how do I keep this warm while I do the other thing” are pretty baffling to me. Maybe you do love to cook, but cooking for many is just a different skillset?
Pretty much how I feel. Cooking can be a great de-stresser. But even I can’t enjoy it on large scale. Small groups — upto 4 maybe. And the thing about cooking is, it has instant gratification, unlike my day job.
Sophia Ayala Gettys says:
Hey there,
Great post! I didn’t love to cook either, but the shopping was definatrely appealing:) I’m an artsy kind of person so seeing it as an art form has helped me. It’s as the cooking is like way of blending my colors when I paint. You have to get the perfect balance of colors… the cool thing about cooking is that it’s one which uses all your senses! I found this the most intereting. Taste wasn’t all that important… I used to eat anything cooked for me or that would cook it’s self, but as I learned to cook and did that at home more and more it IS like second nature not a hassle. Since eating at home I’ve lost weight and am so thankful to really KNOW what is going in to my body, and my family’s for that matter!
Take care!
Sophia
Great analogy to art, I completely agree. Thanks Sophia!!
Matt Shook says:
I’m pretty much an extreme “type B” personality, except when it comes to cooking…where I think I turn into a bit of a control freak. I cook because I really enjoy the meals I make, I have complete control over the quality of ingredients, and it’s often more enjoyable to eat in comfort at home. The times I do eat out are usually social occasions or when I’m too exhausted (mentally or physically) to be bothered with throwing something together…I like my cooking to be a relaxing process.
Great post, Darya! I just wrote about this very subject. I love cooking because I love to create, eat and feed others. I also love to figure out how to make things. Excellent point about becoming comfortable in the kitchen–once you realize it’s not so serious and start having fun the world really opens up.
I just adore cooking not just myself but mainly for others to see the smiles on there faces when they taste the variety of flavours. Its so good to love food, I really have a strong passion for it. But I can not call myself a chef! My partner for some reason gets very stressed when cooking but I find it enjoyable and relaxing.
Renee Martin says:
Great encouragement! There are three things I like about cooking – 1. taking every day fresh, good for you ingredients and making something yummy, 2. Taking existing recipes and revamping them to be good for you, and 3. Sharing the food and revisions with others!
I’m glad you find the post encouraging. The goal was to show people that think they don’t like cooking that it’s OK. It’s still worth it!
The only reason I cook, like you, is to prepare healthy food. The onlny thing I like about it is when I’m entertaining people (and then I like the entertaining part, not the cooking part). One thing that really helps me is to have a set plan for the week. It keeps my food prep and thought time minimal. It takes 15 minutes once a week, and then I know when I need to do once I get home.
Man, I needed to read this. I was looking for a little motivation to get me back in the kitchen again. Although I do like the sound of being a kitchen ninja-or any type of ninja for that matter-you’re right when you say that it is all about preparing something on a daily basis.
Question: are those pomegranate seeds in cereal I see in your banner?
Awesome! Glad to inspire
Yes, though I don’t like that picture because the cereal is processed grains, but yes those are pomegranate seeds on top. My favorite breakfast topping!
Amen! A gourmet I am not – and I’ve been known to cry in the kitchen…. But with a few tasty handy ingredients – topped with nuts & goat cheese – served on a pretty little restaurant style plate – I feel pretty proud of myself.
Great post! Here’s a little what I’ve learned “trying” to hang out in the kitchen….
http://krismoconnor.wordpress.com/2010/10/04/from-panic-to-pride-my-slow-shift-in-the-kitchen/I feel very similar to you – I love food and the end result of cooking, but I don’t really love cooking. I actually used to find it stressful! Part of the reason I started my food blog was to force myself to cook more, and now I no longer find it stressful, but I can’t say I totally enjoy it. I think you’re totally right about it becoming more second nature the more you do it. I’m not quite there yet, but that is my goal and I know I’ll get there soon.
Alice says:
Great post! I’m a fair-weather cook. Meaning I’m a busy full-time working parent who is always on a rush to take care of the family while also meeting my professional obligations. Luckily, I think I’ve become pretty adept at the quick, healthy week-night meal. There are days (mostly on the weekends), when I love having a big cooking project and spending hours in the kitchen and letting my creative culinary juices flow. Then there are days where I just want a fast, healthy meal to keep us all plugging along. I’ve also taught myself that really simple food can seem very “fancy” when it’s presented in particular ways. I love food and I do love to cook – I just try to pick my spots and keep my priorities straight. If I don’t feel much like cooking, I’ve developed a stable of fast, healthy things that require very little effort.
I love baking but I simply don’t have the passion to cook. Cooking is a chore although I love the dishes I make. But just like you, a perfect day doesn’t involve me fretting over pans!
But you are right. I simply have to UN-HATE it. Great post!!!
I think I’m somewhere in the middle when it comes to cooking. I mostly eat what I prepare myself, but because I live alone I don’t try new dishes very often. It’s not very inspiring to prepare meals for one person.
I don’t know if it’s even possible to be a “foodie” if you live alone. Who would eat all the food you prepare?
I was very inspired about cooking when I read Julia Child’s autobiography last year.
That’s interesting. I actually found it a lot easier to cook and experiment when I lived alone. There was no pressure to get something right. If I messed up a dinner to the point where it wasn’t edible, I just treated myself to a burrito instead
Maybe you’ll like this article
http://summertomato.com/10-selfish-reasons-to-cook-alone/There is a harsh reality when it comes to getting down and dirty in the kitchen. As much as I may love adding and crafting ingredients, blending spices and painstakingly getting the right balance of salt/sweet/sour in a dish, the prospect of the enormous amount of prep and all the washing up can sometimes put me off a bit. Most of the time I love cooking. It only works when I’m not being rushed and I am left pretty much alone in the kitchen to get lost in my own thoughts and concentrate on the job in hand. Yes, like you, and many others, I LOVE food. Not just eating it, but what it means, where it comes from, how its made, who made it, every facet of it just fascinates me. There is still a lot I have to learn about it and through you, all the other food bloggers, recipe books and cooking classes just bring me that bit more knowledge day by day to keep it interesting.
As a culinary school educated and professionally trained chef with countless hours in kitchens, one might expect me to disagree with this article. However, Darya you are spot on! Culinary is how I express myself artistically. It’s my medium of expression (See Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/55946209@N08/). I love the fact that food is multi-sensual, universally enjoyed, and passion inspiring. I think the World needs a balance of those of us who love cooking and those who simply enjoy the fruits of that labor.
David,
Thanks for the kind words!!!
Chef Shedric
I cook because my mother couldn’t. She believed that all food should be well-done, then cooked some more to kill all the germs. I saw a Julia Child episode on PBS at age 10, and cooked for myself whenever I was allowed.
Nowadays, I love cooking and baking. I love the satisfaction of taking ingredients and making something fabulous out of them, even if it’s only bread or a pot roast. If the food if fresh and local, all the better – I have become more concerned with mindful eating as a personal step against Big Ag.
I also love feeding other people. I was lucky enough to find a partner who loves to eat my cooking, and I have family to give my extra bakery to, because eating a couple of slices of cake if good, having the rest in the house will lead to eating the entire cake over 2 days as breakfast, lunch and dinner. So I give away bakery to daughters on a regular basis.Your outlook on cooking is a great one to have, and one I’ve tried to instill in my non-culinarily-inspired daughters. Good foods prepared well aren’t solely the province of trained chefs, and it’s easier than it looks!
Jamie says:
Shoot. I saw the title “How To Become A Great Cook Without Being A Chef,” got excited that someone would finally show me how and started reading.
Then I read “It all starts with excellent ingredients and that anyone can master with practice” a little further down.
Then I read “The most important step is getting in the habit of buying good-quality, seasonal food and to whip up something you enjoy.”
And then the post was done.
But what are they? Those basic techniques and basic skills, I mean? At the store I pick up some fresh fruit and standard salad vegetables and then quickly push my cart past the leafy greens section before I can have a panic attack because I have no idea what to do with them.
My feelings toward cooking are similar to yours, and at first I felt ashamed and thought I had to learn to love cooking in order to eat healthy. Luckily, hearing your story (and other friends/family who have similar ones) makes me feel better about learning to tolerate (maybe eventually enjoy?) cooking as a means to an end.
But how do I do it?
Oops — I obviously need to learn more about HTML.
The phrases I was trying to emphasize and instead accidentally eliminated were:
“just a few basic techniques” and
“learning the basic skills you need.”
Sorry about that!
Jacqueline says:
Jamie–I was once in the same boat you are in–no idea how to do any of it. I watched a LOT of Food Network–had it on whenever I was at home doing whatever; I attended some (a lot of) cooking classes nearby; read food blogs and recipes; and did much trial-and-error. I remember the day I tried to wing it in the kitchen with kale and garlic and failed. I swore I was done and that I’d buy all my food from then on! But I kept on trying…I agree with Darya, the secret is to keep it simple (I used to go for all the complicated recipes). Steam, saute, or roast your vegetables. Combine them with whole grains and/or beans. You can learn some salad dressings or just go with good olive oil with or without lemon juice. I also LOVE to eat, and I used to love to go to restaurants. I won’t say I’m the greatest cook ever, but I find I now prefer my cooking to most any other.
Hi Jamie,
Thanks for asking. One resource I used constantly when I was getting started and still rely on frequently is called Cooks Illustrated. The online subscription is like $30 a year, but it is totally worth it. Basically they test all their recipes a zillion times on different kind of kitchen equipement until it is totally idiot proof. That being said, even Cooks is more fancy than you need to be.
Flip through my recipes and look for the kale one. I use that method to cook like half the vegetables I eat. Basically just a little olive oil in a pan, sea salt and cook the greens until they’re bright green (don’t over cook). Add a little garlic to the pan at the end for flavor (just don’t let it burn) and you’re done. Learn a basic stir fry, a basic vinaigrette for salads, how to cook beans, rice and lentils (you can search my recipes for each of those), and roasted veggies (find my cauliflower recipe). If you need more help, Mark Bittman’s podcast, website and book “How To Cook Everything” should point you in the right direction. Once you get started, just stick with it until you’re feeling more adventurous. Then search the food blogs
I fell in love with cooking in college, and as part of a synergy of events, this led to my interest in health and health/food science. I had wanted to be a cartoonist early in life, but I became entranced with science in high school, set my colored pencils aside, and was in need of a new creative outlet. I spent my sophomore year living in a large student “co-op”. Our industrial kitchen provided a new creative laboratory for me to play in when I needed a break from reading brain research articles. I was lucky that buying local, organic, seasonal produce was a routine of the house (who knew vegetables were so damn good?), and it was easy to create good meals with good ingredients (though I admittedly sent a few failed projects to the compost bin). As I got more comfortable in the kitchen, I found that I really wanted to know more about how my ingredients were grown, how they affected human and environmental health, and what science principles underlie my kitchen tinkering. Cooking continues to provide an outlet for my creativity and stimulation for my mind (thanks to summer tomato for contributing brain food). There is still so much to learn (slash, so many more tasty meals to enjoy!).
Alice says:
I cook so that my family can enjoy healthy, tasty foods. It used to be more of a chore, but I’ve come to enjoy it (most of the time) as a creative outlet. Not that I don’t love a night off on a regular basis! I’ve learned so much by watching cooking shows and perusing many cookbooks from my local libary. It’s my own personal challenge to see how healthy and yummy I can make our meals without spending tons of time in kitchen. As a mom who also works full-time, it’s imperative for my sanity that our meals be quick & simple.
I grew up with parents who loved to cook (especially my mother). I also loved trying new food, sushi, gazpacho, etc. I’ve become the “world cuisine” cook in my family. Now that I have my own apartment and am in charge of my own grocery shopping, I buy freshest possible (so very hard living in a small college town in South Dakota…). I’ve came even more into my element. I’ve always been a type A with the kitchen, but I cook with a very free mind. I hardly even follow a recipe other than possibly using it as a guide for the first time making it. I’ve had a few messups, chili so spicy I couldn’t eat it, gazpacho way too garlicy, etc. But I’m still at it, trying to talk class mates into the ease of cooking, why buy prego when you can make a nice cheap homemade tomato sauce in 30 minutes or less?
I also LOVE food, I’m one of those “accidentally chooses most expensive item on menu” people, I’ve had everything from sea urchin, to blood sausage, to monkfish liver, to brain cheese. Cooking is my creative outlet I guess.
I cook because I have to and it’s cheaper than going out every night. That’s pretty much it. I love good food. I love eating it and the feeling of satisfaction after. I like spending time with friends over a meal. I hate everything else about it. I despise meal planning, shopping, recipe hunting, food prep, and the actual act of cooking. Oddly, I don’t mind cleaning up.
I’ll admit: people who find cooking relaxing or use it as a creative outlet…more power to you, but that completely puzzles me. I’m never more stressed than when I’m cooking. And what I cook is rarely all that great. Even in my small town, I can guarantee that there are half a dozen restaurants I can go to where the food will be much, much better than anything I make (minus the stress of shopping, cooking, etc.). The only reason I’m not at these places all the time is money. If I were independently wealthy, I would most likely eat out for all meals or hire a personal chef.
So I cook because I have to. That’s it. And I figure if it’s that the way it is I should try to learn how to do it better and make the food as good as I can get it, which is why I read this blog and a couple others. But it’s most definitely *not* out of a love for the kitchen. I hope that doesn’t make me a pariah in these parts….
By nature I’m good in cooking and creating recipes that are healthy and tasty. I go through a lot of trial cooking before I come up with the extreme makeover dish that is healthy and tasty.
“In my experience, food and passion always intertwine. Passion is food for the soul’s mood at any particular time.” Tammy Mollai
Great chef I’m not, but I love to cook for my family. Thanks for a great article.
Dee says:
Darya,
For me it’s the same as you. I cook for health and convenience I’m surely no chef. I always say, I cook things that are good to eat, it may not necessarily be delicious, but it’s safe, healthy and edible. I’m still very challenged in the kitchen. My 17 year old loves to try recipes – especially those that involve baking casseroles, cookies and cakes. I just buy the peas, veg, meat and add herbs and spices for palatbility and do the basic cooking so that it is fit for human consumption… I have no lofty aspirations to be a ‘best cook’ since that really is not my primary objective – would be a nice to have though, probably one day….I cook because I like to eat, and if I eat restaurant/take-out, I cannot maintain my lower weight. Also, I love the pretty colors and strange veggies at the farmers market, so I want to make pretty things, and eat them. Before I bumped into my first farmers market, I mostly ate out of cans and boxes, then I wanted to buy the pretty produce. Unfortunately, that stuff doesn’t prepare itself, I had to figure out what to do with it. OK, I admit, most of my stuff doesn’t always end up pretty, but it’s tasty enough. It’s strong motivation to be normalish weight, not obese, though chopping veg not my idea of a good time.
It has gotten easier in time, mostly I eat the same 4-5 dishes and cycle through them, but two or three times a month, I make something totally new. I agree that it’s a lot more fun to cook for others, especially if they appreciate it, but I learn on myself (emergency burrito appreciated) and I make enough for 3 or 4 leftover meals, as well.
Hardly any recipe is truly complicated though the brain might say it is.
Time consuming and needing the correct steps to be followed perhaps.
I tend to cook to what might be called a ‘peasant’ style ie I keep things simple yet I can ramp up when neededI started cooking when we had food intolerance issues in my children. No soy, no dairy, no nuts made for very few “convenience” foods. I did not cook much in my life before kids. They have outgrown their intolerances, but I have learned that I prefer my own cooking to most prepackaged, premade foods.
So I guess our trials for a short time were a blessing for the long term. I realized I was comfortable in the kitchen when my mom and sister started teasing me about never following a recipe without substitutions/changes.
i really enjoyed this piece. Sometimes, I find it difficult to find ways to motivate others to cook because I really like to cook. This was an encouraging piece that empathizes with those who find cooking a chore. I feel knowing what goes into your food is hugely related to how you eat and can sway your choices toward more nutritious food.
What do you think?
about.me
Darya Pino
PhDork
Darya is the creator of Summer Tomato, one of TIME's 50 Best Websites of 2011. She received her Ph.D in neuroscience from UCSF and her bachelor’s degree in Molecular and Cell Biology from UC Berkeley.
Darya writes about food, health and science for several publications and is a dedicated foodist, health enthusiast, and proud geek girl.
Summer Tomato
Summer Tomato Live
Recent Posts
Popular Articles
Top Healthy Eating Tips
- Automatic Health: Lessons From Personal Finance
- 10 People You Can't Trust For Diet Advice
- 10 Tips To Save Money While Eating Healthy
- Don't Eat This, Don't Eat That: How To Eat Healthy Without Fast Food
- Farmers Market Update: What's the point?
- How I Lost 20 Pounds In 9 Months Without Dieting
- How To Become A Slow Eater
- 10 Reasons To Never Eat Free Food
- Taste Psychology: Learning To Love Foods You Don't Like
- 30 Ways To Slow and Prevent Aging
- Are You Eating In The Matrix?
- How to Convince Family And Friends To Eat Healthier
- Healthy Snacking 101
- Is It Healthier To Eat Like A Caveman?
- Top 10 Most Underrated Health Foods
Search
Appearances & Mentions
The 50 Best Websites of 2011
TIME ..................................... The Best Websites of 2011
Ecosalon ..................................... Guide To Supermarket Navigation
Food Politics ..................................... Boxed Lunch
CNN Eatocracy ..................................... 10 Great Blogs For Veggie Lovers
Serious Eats ..................................... Combo plate: Boogeyman farmers markets, sweet treats and more
Los Angeles Times ..................................... Top 10 Mistakes Made by Farmers Market Noobz
EcoSalon ..................................... Bin Diets: Get Slim For Less
The Irish Times ..................................... Get Fit By Becoming A Food Geek
Geek's Dream Girl ..................................... Get Healthier with a (Surprisingly Tasty) Squash Pasta Substitute
Lifehacker ..................................... How to Find Time to Cook Healthy Meals Dumb Little Man ..................................... My secret weapon against the battle of the bulge
San Francisco Chronicle ..................................... Saving Leftovers for the Dog
New York Times ..................................... When Is A Calorie Not A Calorie?
MizFitArchives
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
David 
via summertomato.com
via outlookindia.com
via howtogeek.com